Anonymous asked: post moar selfies.
Pretty sure that’s the last possible thing this blog needs, Anon.
Also, is now an appropriate time to mention that I kinda really hate when they’re referred to as “selfies”?
I don’t know why, it just bothers me. I think because in my mind a “selfie” isn’t just any picture of yourself. It’s one of those pictures where you’re in the bathroom, taking the picture yourself, and your phone is in the picture, with the flash on, and you’re sticking your butt out, and doing duckface, and are holding the camera at an angle above your head so that you look skinnier and people can see down your shirt…
Yeahhhh, dunno why that’s the automatic image in my head when someone says “selfie”. Anyway, this has been a pretty pointless Q&A session so I guess maybe I’ll post pictures or something sometime. I make no promises.
I had to Google the word “goob”. First hit on Urban Dictionary: “a person who thinks that theyre funny or cool but really theyre just awkward and weird.”
…Yeah that’s pretty accurate. Thanks, Henry.
nellieblystunad replied to your post: You’re definitely overreacting to the hot guy italian dressing commercial issue…
If tumblr posts had a batting average you’d be batting damn near close to 1.000
I also went to Urban Dictionary to try to sort out the Baseball metaphor, but it wasn’t as helpful. I was able to ascertain that it’s a compliment though, so thanks! :]
Anonymous asked: eww, i didn't realize you're such a cunt
[Come back when you have a real argument Mr. Ad H. Ominem.]
Anonymous asked: You're definitely overreacting to the hot guy italian dressing commercial issue. There's no outcry about it because people are realizing it's about time more stuff is directed towards women as it used to be always the women being sexualized for male consumers in a male-dominated society. It's now a case of women breaking that glass ceiling and who gives a shit, it's a salad dressing commercial, ffs.
[Anon here is referring to this post].
Yeah! That will balance it out! Rather than advocating that neither sex be sexualized and objectified in advertising, just make sure there’s an equal balance of sexualizing of both the sexes.
It’s so simple, I’m going to call the nearest university to make sure they appoint you as head of the Women’s Studies department.
Do. You. Even. Know. What. The. Glass Ceiling. IS. You. Complete. MORON?
Who gives a shit? I give a shit obviously, what a stupid fucking question. Oh, wait, let me back up and not take you so literally. You must’ve meant, who gives a shit besides me, right? One of those sneaky questions that attempts to trap the answerer by forcing them to even acknowledge it as a valid question. Except I don’t.
I’ll say now as I’ve said a million times in the past, I don’t think the number of people who agree with something make it right. I don’t have your rad-fem collective mob rule mentality I guess. I don’t give a shit if 10,000 trolls conduct the perfect raid on my Ask telling me they all don’t give a shit about this commercial, if I’m the only one who does I guess I’ll get to declare myself the only non-asshole left in humanity. /rant
when there is a crazy ass dude yelling outside your window for over an hour and it’s almost 2 in the morning,
BUT you don’t want to call the cops because you don’t want him to get his ass beat you just want him to stop shouting omg I need to sleeppppp
death-2-whitecismanapes:
So I keep hearing about how we should only judge people based on the content of their character, their skills, their brains etc. WRONG. For hundreds of years, the patriarchy has dictated what skills are beneficial to society, what constitutes intelligence, and what constitutes a “good person.” Most often, the people who poses these patriarchy-approved merits are the cancer of this planet: The white cis heterosexual man-animals. In fact, the whole concept of “merit” was invented by them through history’s most disgusting internalized misogynist; Ayn Rand. In fact, if you’ve ever thought that someone should be judged by merit, then you might as well change your name to Bubba and join the fucking Tea Party. The only way people should be judged is by their race, sex, and weight. What does this mean in practice? It means that fat womyn of color should be granted all the power in society with all the white man-animals being either exterminated or used as reproductive slaves (artificial insemination only, since all oppression rod in vagina “sex” is rape). This dear readers, is how you smash the patriarchal meritocracy
So, as you all know, I’m not super active on Tumblr these days. Can anyone tell me if this is a known troll or?
Because I honestly can’t tell, I mean, her FAQ says she identifies as an amoeba…
Are you fucking kidding me
![“[Rape] is the result of a very human escalation that she was very much seemed to be a part of.”
…Ignoring the incredibly poor sentence structure here, can I just say WHAT? No. No no no. You’ve got that mixed up. You’re confusing humans with animals.
Animals rape each other all the time and nobody gives a shit because they’re just instinctively trying to keep their species going and animals can’t comprehend 3rd or 4th level concepts and therefore can’t be held to the same standards of morality as humans. Humans however, have a higher conceptual consciousness which is why they are held to a higher standard of behaving. We don’t have instincts for many things in human life: happiness, romance, how to bake a damn souffle… so trying to live based solely on our instincts wouldn’t work out too great for us anyway.
So no, rape is not “very human”. Some humans live by moral principles. Some humans believe it is inexcusably, unforgivably, indefensibly WRONG to hurt or force someone against their will/without their consent.
As far as I’m concerned, anyone who falls outside of that doesn’t deserve to be called human.](http://25.media.tumblr.com/db7e39b9a85e01ee6af19b52a7c22db9/tumblr_mm8vjlessC1qb1bb3o1_500.png)
I just don’t have the heart to tell this patriot that “most terrorist attacks” are committed by governments.
